Maybe to early yet but has anyone tried these yet.I like the Angel GTs A spec but ile maybe try these out soon .https://www.tyreleader.co.uk/motorbike-tyres/michelin/road-5/190-50-zr17-73w-817470?
Apparently it wont fit the Gtr http://moto.michelin.co.uk/GB/en/tyres/products/road-5.html
Why not? Has same sizes as the GTR and the same weight ratings as the PR4GT.
I agree.Found this link. scroll down and they say we need the Gt version. i dont get it ..http://motorcycle.michelinman.com/US/en/tires/products/road-5.html
In The Michelin webpage: -
"...the Kawasaki 1400 GTR require the GT version of MICHELIN Road 5, which will become available in 2019. Until then please choose MICHELIN Pilot Road 4 GT tires."
Or keep to Angel gts. Cracking tyre.
There is no reason why the standard PR5 can not be used as the tyres are of the correct speed and load rating. The GT version has a stiffer carcass to aid cooler running under extreme loads and temperatures placed upon the tyres, this is to aid longevity of the tread rubber. As northern Europe does not really get very high temperatures I do not see any reason why the standard tyre can not be used. Yes the GT version "may" last an extra 1000 miles but myself I'd rather have a warmer tyre and more grip and sacrifice a few miles in tyre wear.
I use the Michelin Pilot Power 3 on my bike, I've toured all over Europe on my old ZZR 1400, which when loaded up with luggage was essentially no different to what the GTR will be now. I usually get decent miles from the tyres and can't fault them in wet or dry weather. I'd also point out that as the GT version has a stiffer carcass it reduces the contact patch slightly and they are more prone to punctures.
Front 120/70 ZR 17 M/C (58W), Rear 190/50 ZR 17 M/C (73W) If your tyres of choice are rated like this they are safe to use. If you want to add an extra element of safety fit a 190/55 ZR 17 (75W) Rear tyre. Offers higher peak loading and a larger contact patch on the road.
I think that if Michelin (and Metzeler, for that matter) have gone to such lengths as to design and produce a GT tyre for heavyweight bikes, then I have to say they know what they are talking about. I'm sure they don't do it just for something to do.
A less stiff tyre will work, of course it will, but I think I'll go with the professionals wisdom
Quote from: Burchy on January 30, 2018, 10:45:50 AM
I think that if Michelin (and Metzeler, for that matter) have gone to such lengths as to design and produce a GT tyre for heavyweight bikes, then I have to say they know what they are talking about. I'm sure they don't do it just for something to do.
A less stiff tyre will work, of course it will, but I think I'll go with the professionals wisdom
I was with Michelin R&D last week and asked the question as to why they produce a GT Tyre, short answer the GT version offers approximately 20% greater mileage when used on heavy touring bikes as the compound runs cooler, thus wearing away at a slower rate. The compound used is identical in both versions, however the GT version has thicker (by 0.32 mm) radial belts within 1 layer. They want us to be happy not only with the tyres overall performance but also with the mileage they are able to achieve. Good news for anyone that looks for great longevity in a tyre.
I hope they don't puncture as much as they used to. Michelins cost me a fortune that's why I went to perelli.
Here is the reply from an email i sent to Michelin. Ile stick with the Angel GT . We are planning on creating the Road 5 GT versions for sale early next year, and in the meantime will continue to produce the popular Pilot Road 4 GT for your bike.
The Pilot Road 4 GT has an adapted carcass construction to give better stability and support for specific larger GT style sports tourers such as the 1400 GTR. They do give a noticeably improved ride quality even over the new Road 5 tyres, and are the best tyre that we make for your bike. It will take us a little more time to make a Road 5 GT version that will be a step forward, so until then the best option for you is still the Pilot Road 4 GT.
sounds like you can fit road 5s but road 4GTs are recommended as being better
I never used the GTs on mine, just the plain vanilla PR4.
Stick well, last well, great in the wet.
I'll be fitting PR5 once these wear out.
As for punctures, I've had 2 in 73k miles.
One on the OEM BT021s and the other on my last set of PR3s.
had a puncture in a PR3 back in 2010 and another in a PR4 GT in 2016
Got 4's (not gt) on my Suzuki sv1000n that I only ride solo and they've been superb.
On a 7 hour across Germany in non stop torrential rain they didn't miss a beat.
I'll go 4's on the gtr soon because after many years of two up touring on heavy fully loaded bikes I'm convinced that gt rear tyres are the way to go.
I'd love 5's but I can't wait for the gt version.
I've tried both the PR4 GT and non GT versions on my GTR. I don't like the GT versions as I found the wear profile to be very pronounced on the side of the front. I ended up with the edges wearing quicker than the centre of the tyre creating a noticeable drop as you tip in to corners. (not sure why this would be different on the GT unless the centre tread is harder on these??)
Must admit that I haven't tried them since I started doing mainly motorway rides, so they could be better for that.
They probably also help with the "stupid-speed" cornering shimmy, but I rarely get that fast to notice.
If I rode with a pillion I'd probably go for the GT too.
Just got the PR5's fitted last week. Only road it home as the front wheel bearings needed replacing again (every 30K for me)
First impressions are that they feel really heavy. I initially thought it was due to the bearings, but having had them replaced it still feels heavy. Low speed manoeuvrability feels very slow. I'll update later this week after I've done a few fast commutes.